Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for June 17th, 2010

Sir Alexander Fleming (1881-1955)
Discoverer, Nobel Laureate

Dr.Fleming discovered penicillin while working in an old laboratory. A mold spore which was blown in through the open window, landed on a culture plate he was about to examine. This led to his remarkable discovery.
Some years later he was led through a research lab which was built using the latest state of the art in technology: air-conditioned, dust free and with super-sterile setting. ‘What a pity, you didn’t have a place like this to work in,’ remarked the guide, ‘what you could have discovered in such surroundings?’
‘Not penicillin,’ replied Fleming dryly.
2.
Alexander Fleming was awarded the Nobel Prize for medicine in 1945. When he arrived in Stockholm to receive the award he had a bad cold. Throughout the ceremony he used his handkerchief repeatedly. Later as was leaving teary eyed and sniffing one official shook his head sympathetically and said to him, ‘No good for colds?’
3.
En route from London airport to give a lecture in Belfast, Sir Alexander Fleming was told that all the seats on his plane were taken by the VIPs. It turned out these high priority personages were all officials from the Ministry of Health who had been sent to attend his lecture.

Henry Norris Russell
Astronomy, Princeton

Once the Princeton astronomer was giving a lecture on the Milky Way and at the end a woman from the audience asked: ‘If our world is so little and the universe is so great, can we really believe that God pays any attention to us?’
‘That madam,’ replied Dr. Russell, depends entirely on how big a God you believe in.’
2.
Eugene Paul Wenger, one of the outstanding nuclear scientists was noted for his politeness. Once encountering a rude attendant Dr. Wenger listened patiently for a while his abusive language and he said, ‘Go to hell please.’
3.
Norbert Weiner
Mathematician

Professor Weiner fitted the popular image of an absent-minded professor, brilliant but eccentric to extreme. One day he wrote out a complex problem on the blackboard. Shortly after he wrote the answer down having worked out complex steps in his head.
A young graduate, seeking a clue to the master’s approach, asked: ‘Professor Weiner, isn’t there another way of doing that problem?’
‘Why yes.’ replied the Professor.
Turning to the blackboard again, he picked up the chalk and reflected for a moment – and wrote down the answer a second time.’
2.
Professor Weiner was crossing the quadrangle of the campus one afternoon when a student stopped him to discuss a problem.
The professor stopped and answered the problem and at the end he asked, ‘Which way was I going when you stopped me?’
‘You were walking that way, sir,’ the student pointed the direction and the professor with a relief murmured,’Oh then I’ve had lunch,’ and continued on his way.

John Von Neumann (1903-1956)
Mathematician, Professor

Like Einstein he was also one of the full professors of the Institute for the Advanced Studies at Princeton. Unlike Einstein whose mind was slow and contemplative and could chew on a problem for long Neumann’s mind was swift. Either he solved a problem right away or not at all. His wizardry prompted Hans Bethe, who was the Director of the Theoretical Physics division to comment, ‘I have sometimes wondered whether a brain like von Neumann’s does not indicate a species superior to that of man?’
One day at a research organization there was a meeting to discuss the possibilities of building a new kind of computer. Von Neumann who was present after hearing their requirements said, ‘Well gentlemen, suppose you give me an example of the kind of problem that had taken two years to solve.’ While the presentation was completed, John von Neumann sat with his head buried in his hands and then scribbled on a pad. He said that he had the answer.
While the scientists satin stunned silence von Neumann outlined various steps, which provided the solution to the problem.
One of the scientists then laughed and said, ‘Johnny, we need this machine because we don’t have a von Neumann’.
2.
Von Neumann’s lectures were brilliant but he had a habit of erasing formula from the blackboard as soon as he had reached the bottom to continue the steps all over again from the top. Many of his students had difficulties to keep track. On one such occasion one waited till he had finished the problem to say, ‘I see proof, by erasure.’
benny

Read Full Post »

School District 202 in Plainfield, Illinois, joins other school districts across the nation in banning “look-alike drugs”: candy cigarettes, fake chewing tobacco, non-alcoholic beer, and oregano. Various reasons are cited for the ban, one being that candy cigarettes can possibly lead to real cigarette use, that they send an inappropriate presmoking message. Secondly, that the prevalence of fake drugs makes it difficult for school administrators to find the real ones. And that the use of certain substitutes such as mint-flavored herbal snuff increase the chance that users may be considered “yuppies.” (Chicago Tribune, 1/7/92, 2/7/92). If child minders cannot distinguish between the real and playacting why should they mind children? They should spend their time usefully elsewhere and not mess up with children.
Much of our draconian laws arise from our own unfounded fears. Like Israel choking the Palestinians in Gaza and they think it is collective punishment and would send a strong message to Hamas. I am sure if given chance the state of Israel would be at it even after 100 years. From this collective punishment the only group that is reaping much in public support and sympathy is Hamas.
Israel in a way is raising a fresh wave of intifada from child of today.
If the powers that be in Israel could only distinguish between a punishment that work and that doesn’t the Palestine problem would have been by now on the table. Like the school administrators cannot distinguish between fake drugs and the real, the Israel government cannot search their own hearts or minds and arrive at a balanced view without the pressure groups orthodox Jews and the like, coming in between.
I am responsible for my life. It is plain as day. But interference from all corners should make me irresponsible for the mess around me, there must be wrong with laws that create this situation? For instance I paid the cost of raising my child, a quarter million of hard earned money, and end up with a son who stays home and smoke pot; he cannot even speak English that I thought was requisite for a well educated man. Who is to blame. Somewhere all my labor,discipline, industry and everything I regarded as fruits of progress have been messed up.
In short someone has shortchanged quarter of a million of my money, I raised with sweat of my brow. Who is irresponsible party and is to blame?
benny

Read Full Post »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,990 other followers