Indian Cavalcade-2

Field Marshall Archibald Wavell(1883-1950)
Viceroy of India

Once he was the guest of Lady Cunrad who asked him, ’What do you think about love, Field Marshall?’
Knowing how tongue tied he could be in company the question especially about love made many who assembled there to perk up their ears. Wavell replied, ’It is like a cigar. If it goes out you can light it again, but it never tastes quite the same.’

Field Marshall Sam Manekshaw(1914-2008)
Soldier

As a brigade commander, he was once crossing the Sutlej River, which was in spate.
To make things worse the launch developed engine trouble and was moving out of control headlong to a fall. Meanwhile the other officers swam ready to safety. But Manekshaw sat there nonchalantly twirling his moustache, as though he intended to brave it out. Luckily for him help came in time. Leading ashore the staff captain complimented him for his cool. ‘You didn’t even remove your boots!’ he exclaimed.
‘What the hell for?’ replied Manekshaw,’I don’t know how to swim.’

Morarji Desai(1896-1995)
5th Prime Minister

The former Prime Minister of India after his graduation in 1917 applied to join the provincial Civil Service. During the interview he faced three Government secretaries, all Englishmen. Towards the end he was asked how he would feel if he didn’t get the job. ‘Who knows I may get something better,’ Desai told them in his characteristic manner. The post indeed went to someone else but the Board impressed with the candidate created an additional post to accommodate him.
2.
Morarji Desai, the former PM of India for his many faults was a man of very strong principles. His obsession with rectitude was his undoing in the summer of 1969 when Mrs. Indira Gandhi fielded her candidate VV Giri against the official Congress candidate Mr. N. Sanjiv Reddy for the Presidential post. It was open war against the Syndicate: Kamaraj and others wanted to take action against her but Morarji stayed their hand until after the election.
‘You cannot condemn a person until the charge against him or her is proved beyond a shadow of doubt.’
The events showed later that initiative for such niceties of law was taken out of their hands.
Time determines how right is the law as in the case of treason: when the knife of an assassin, say that of Brutus struck at Caesar, law was neutral. Had Brutus subsequently won power there would have been no case against him for treason.

Indira Gandhi(1917-1984)
Prime Minister

While filming Indira Gandhi film maker M.S Sathyu spotted a framed picture of her illustrious grandfather in one corner of her study. In what he thought was an inspired shot the director asked, ‘Madam, will you dust that photograph?’ The Prime Minister obligingly sent for a duster.’ No Madam, your sari end… if you would wipe with it that will show your attachment.’
Mrs. Gandhi cut him short saying, ’don’t be silly! I don’t have attachment with dust.’
2.
In 1971 elections, Congress Party rallied around Indira Gandhi whose slogan’ Garibi Hatao!'(Remove Poverty!). When Indira Gandhi arrived at Arrah, a small Bihar town she was already two hours late. By the time she climbed over to the platform she could sense the restive crowd and she took a sip of water and began her speech. One in the crowd heckled:’Indira Hatao!’
She stopped her speech to say, ‘It is now up to you. Indira hatao or Garibi Hatao.’
With that she walked of the dais leaving the crowd speechless.

Dilip Kumar (1922-)
Actor

In one of the Air India flights from Geneva to Mumbai Dilip Kumar was the only passenger besides an elderly gentleman in the first class cabin. Dilip Kumar an household name and one of the reigning film stars was intrigued by his companion who was totally absorbed in his work. It was G.D Birla, the great industrialist who had only seen two films in his life and neither of which featured the matinee idol. It was a sobering thought for him he was more or less a face in the crowd outside the reel life.

Sir Tej Bahadur Sapru(1875-1949)

Once Sapru was arguing a case in the Allahabad High Court before a non-ICS judge with considerable judicial experience. Sapru went on explaining the basis of civil law at length at which the Judge was a bit peeved to observe: Sir Tej, please remember, I am not an ICS judge.’
Pat came the reply,’ I know my Lord. It is a very difficult examination to pass.’
2.
Mohammed Ali Jinnah and he were once appearing in a Hyderabad court in a case, which Koran was quoted. The court asked Jinnah to translation which he could not. Sir Tej offered to translate the quotation for the court. Next day the local newspaper carried the headline,’ Maulana Tej Bahadur translates Koran for Pandit Mohammed Ali Jinnah.’ (Ack.JN Sahni-Illustrated weekly of India, Dec 26,1976)
benny

Read Full Post »

titlepage

Read Full Post »

Danton-1983

Among the great Polish filmmakers—Krzysztof Kieslowski, Krzysztof Zanussi, Agnieszka Holland, Roman Polanski—Andrzej Wajda remains unique in the way he has explored in his films the tortuous path his nation had to take. The question of her national identity: what sort of Poland do the people want in the post war produced the Ashes and Diamonds a classic. Between his fifties war trilogy and his most recent film, Katyn (2007) we have Danton a minor classic where the themes do find echo in what was taking place in Poland.

‘The film was based on the play The Danton Affair, by Stanisława Przybyszewska, first performed in 1931. Przybyszewska was a Communist whose sympathies lay with the radical Robespierre. Wajda revived the play in 1975, but he turned it on its head, making a hero out of the more moderate Danton. By 1980, the high point of the Solidarity liberation movement, he had arranged to make his version of the play into a film, a Polish-French co-production with Gaumont. Studio scenes were to be done in Poland, while location scenes were to be shot in France. Martial law was imposed on December 13, 1981, however, in a coup directed by the Soviet Union: General Jaruzelski was installed, Solidarity outlawed, communications cut, a curfew introduced, and production in Poland became impossible. The whole project was then transferred to Paris, with Wajda taking some of his Polish actors, including Wojciech Pszoniak, who plays Robespierre, and a small group of co-workers. As a result, Wajda, this most Polish of directors, was forced to become an émigré, only returning from exile in 1989, when the Jaruzelski government fell. (He went on to receive his adopted country’s highest film honor, the César, for best director in 1983.)’(Quoted from Leonard Quart/Criterion Collection news)
Wajda’s tale of the struggle between two factions spearheading the French Revolution is not an isolated event. Political fall out of an ideal produces factions and we see it in the solidarity movement and in the soviet backed government of General Jaruzelski. This we saw in the struggle between Stalin and Trotsky for the mantle of Lenin. Beyond this parallel what was happening in Poland in the early 80s was altogether different. Danton and Robespierre represent two factions, one moderate and the other all out radical just as their personalities are opposites to one another. Danton is larger than life, venal and easy while Robespierre the lawyer from Arras is austere and chaste. Danton (Gérard Depardieu) and Robespierre (Wojciech Pszoniak) were close friends and fought together in the French Revolution, but by 1793 Robespierre had become the ruler and in order to wipe out opposition he ordered for a series of mass executions that became known as the Reign of Terror. Danton, well known as a spokesman of the people, had been living in relative solitude in the French countryside, but he returned to Paris to challenge Robespierre’s violent rule and call for the people to demand their rights. Robespierre, however, could not accept such a challenge and tries to win him over to his side.

There is much more than a tacit understanding to the reign of terror at stake. While Danton realizes the path he had set out has gone off the rails the other is all the more for bloodletting. Danton knows from events played out around him Revolution has become like Saturn devouring it own children. Robespierre takes advantage of Danton’s vacillation to outmaneuver him and arrest him. Thus five years after the fall of Bastille it is the will of Robespierre, Saint- Just et al that overrides the voice of restraint.

There is a telling scene that takes place in the studio of Jacques Louis David where the dictator in waiting the incorruptible Robespierre is sitting for the painter. When he is handed a palm he refuses it since it reminds one of martyr’s palm. He also insists erasing his enemies from the group painting and it echoes Stalin’s purge of history of Bolshevik revolution. (In that famous photo Lenin on return from exile harangues people where Trotsky the organizer of the Red Army stands next to the podium. Stalin on taking control had him airbrushed from history albeit pictorially. )

Both factions hold however one component common to their cause. Both are maneuvering in the name of the people. Robespierre who, as Danton would point out at a crucial one to one meeting shrinks from all contact, – and in all probability had never laid, speaks of man on the street as matter of his right. Yet Robespierre who holds the trump cards says: ‘We want Danton’s death.’
Judge Fouquier: ‘I am not your private executioner.’
Robespierre the ‘incorruptible’ of course wants him to effect the order of the Committee just the same as ‘people’s executioner.’
It is an irony of all blood baths that the dictators unleash are in the name of the people.
The earthy ‘larger than life’ Danton and the puritanical Robespierre fight like whores for their favor.
Danton: ‘A political trial is a duel. If the government accuses we can accuse them.’ The idea is to create doubts in the minds of people. The same ploy the government also uses in making Danton and other ‘conspirators’ sit along with the criminal like common thieves and pimps. .
Themes, which figure in Danton, are both political and ethical and are timeless.
The irrefutable fact that Danton set up the Tribunal does not mean he was above that. The hero of August 10 was evidently consumed by his own creation and also took Robespierre within three months.
The trouble with revolutions is that you don’t control insurrection with words once the blood is drawn whether in the streets or in the bedchamber.
Danton whose voice was like thunder shaking the very dome but as essayed by Gerard Deperdiue could not raise it beyond a whimper. The same could be said of the film Danton.
‘In addition to Mr. Depardieu and Mr. Pszoniak, the excellent cast includes Patrice Chereau as Danton’s journalist-friend, Camille Desmoulins; Angela Winkler as Lucille Desmoulins, Camille’s wife who followed him to the scaffold; Boguslaw Linda, as Saint Just, and Roger Planchon, who is partciuarly good as Fourquier Tinville, who prosecuted Danton and his associates in a rigged trial’ (quoted from NY Times review. Wajda’s ‘DANTON,’ Inside the French Revolution by Vincent Canby; Sept 28, 1983)

benny

u

Read Full Post »

skeleton of horse-sketch

Read Full Post »

berner sennen-sketch

Read Full Post »

out of sketch book

Read Full Post »

Ernest Bevin-anecdotes

Britain’s first post war Foreign secretary was a master of the mixed metaphors. When the Council of Europe was first mooted, he rejected the proposal in uncompromising terms. “When you open that Pandora’s box, you’ll find it full of Trojan horses.
2.
As the Foreign secretary he was once invited by the Chinese Ambassador in London Dr. FT Cheng. When asked whether he ever had Chinese food before he replied yes. He said his favorite dish was ‘no. 8.’ This stumped the Ambassador until he realized outside China the dishes in Chinese restaurants were given numbers to make it easier for selection. After some guesswork Dr. Cheng figured it was chopseuy.
Since then no.8 became a staple dish served at every diplomatic dinner.
benny

Read Full Post »

Their Great Moments

Ernest Bevin(1881-1951)
Between the 1920s and 1950s, Bevin was a central figure in the British labour movement and best known for his time as Minister of Labour in the war-time coalition government, and as Foreign Secretary in the post-war Labour Government.
In 1922 Bevin was one of the founding leaders of the Transport and General Workers Union (TGWU), which soon became Britain’s largest trade union. Upon his election as the union’s general secretary, he became one of country’s leading labour leaders, and their strongest advocate within the Labour Party. Bevin was a pragmatic trade unionist who believed in getting material benefits for his members through direct negotiations, with strike action to be used as a last resort.(wikipedia)
Bevin went to Bristol in order to make his own way in the world. He was thirteen and unskilled and friendless but in the school of hard knocks all that would change. He was a kitchen boy , a grocer’s errand boy, a conductor on the city trams. He was twenty something when socialism held out promise and his involvement in it led him to the trade union movement.
Graduation from the school of hard knocks made him take a practical approach to the problems and his rock hard integrity won him support from rank and file. He became the assistant general secretary of the union.
In the 20s the union on behalf of the dockworkers placed before the ship owners a claim for 16 shillings a day towards wages and was rejected. The majority of Transport Workers Federation was for strike action. Bevin knew that the union was not ready or financially sound for a prolonged struggle. He advised the union to place the matter before the Court of Enquiry under a High Court judge.
Sir Lyndon McCassey K.C an authority on Industrial Law represented the shipowners while Bevin appeared for the dock workers.
Bevin’s argument was that the ship owners had in the war years done well and profits were still high after the war. Whereas the lot of the workers had worsened. The wage increase since 1905 had double and it meant nothing since the cost of living gone up four times. Bevin argued, “What did this mean? Simply this, that the dock worker’s wife ‘the greatest Chancellor of the Exchequer that ever lived’ had to keep her man and her family on half of what she had been given in 1905. The present demand was for a wage of 16s. a day. Was that too much to pay a man who might be required to work sixty hours a week, lumping great loads about in dirty and dangerous conditions, and at the end of it no guarantee of employment beyond today?What was the alternative? If you don’t meet the docker’s demand then go to the Prime Minister, the minister of Education and the rest, and tell them to close the schools and all that is made for a better life and get the men down to a simple ‘fodder basis.’ ”
Then the ship owner’s counsel presented his budget (drawn by an eminent Cambridge economist Professor A.L Bowley) and averred a weekly wage of 77 s. was sufficient to feed and clothe a a docker’s family.
That evening after the hearing for the day was closed Bevin went with his secretary to street market in Canning Town and spent that amount as per the budget of the Cambridge professor. Then they cooked the purchases back to the Union’s office, cooked their dinner and divided into five portions since this was taken to be the size of an average docker’s family. Each portion they then placed on two plates, one containing a tiny piece of meat with similarly tiny portions of potatoes and greens, and the other a bit of cheese and a slice of bread.
The next morning when the Court was in session Bevin asked permission to produce what dinner the family could have according to the budget. Producing the plates he turned to the judge, “I ask you my Lord to examine the dinner which counsel for the employers considers sufficient to sustain the strength of a dock worker who has to haul, say seventy ton’s of wheat on his back in the course of the day.” The demonstration struck home and Bevin won the case. (ack: 100 Great Modern Lives-ed. John Canning Odhams Books Ltd.,)

benny

Read Full Post »

Conductors-anecdotes

Otto Klemperer (1885-1973)
Once Otto Klemperer, the great German conductor and a recording executive named George H. de Mendelssohn- Bartholdy walked into a music shop. Klemperer walked upto the young man behind the counter and asked, ‘Do you have Klemperer conducting Beethoven’s Fifth?’
‘No.’ the salesman replied, ‘We have it conducted by Ormandy and Toscanini. Why do you want it by Klemperer?’
The conductor irritated drew himself to say, ‘Because I am Klemperer.’ The young man surveyed him coolly and glanced at his companion and he said, ‘And that I suppose, is Beethoven?’
‘No,’ snapped Klemperer, ‘That is Mendelssohn.’
Sir Thomas Beecham(1879-1961)
He was rehearsing a group of amateurs for a benefit performance of Aida. Despite many attempts to get a particular effect from the choristers the result was discouraging. Just as he was on the verge of throwing his baton in disgust one of the horses which was to be tied wandered onto the stage,- and then to every one’s dismay, disgraced himself.
‘Frightful manners,’ exclaimed Sir Beecham, ‘but ah what a critic!’(ack: mishel Piastro-Scribner’s Commentator)
Victor Borge(1909-2000) Danish born conductor, pianist
Victor Borge, who had just brought a chicken farm was asked if he knew anything about rearing chickens.
‘No’ the pianist replied, ‘but the chickens do.’
benny

Read Full Post »

Orpheus film-mirror

Read Full Post »